Faye (
said_scarlett) wrote2008-03-08 12:46 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
On LJs New Policies, and Smutty Drabble Requests!
You know, LJs new policies are clear, pretty well written, and damn sane and sensible. And honestly, I think their new policies regarding child pornography are sensible, sane, and pretty much the same as any other website. There's still some wording that leaves some debate and could use some cleaning up, but hey, we've gotten actual word from official LJ staff that text depicting minors in sexual situations... isn't a violation of any TOS or rules.
I do wish they'd clear up some of the issues regarding art, but I can only hope they're on the right track. And admitting that yes, non-photographic images of minors engaged in sex isn't illegal, they just don't want it here. Which, hey, I may not exactly be happy with that, but it's their decision and they're being pretty up front about it.
I'm just glad they finally realized that yes, smutty fan fiction with teenagers isn't child porn.
I think this calls for another round of Porn for the Revolution!
So give me a pairing and a prompt, and I'll write you between 100 and 500 words of pure smut! Bonus points if the characters are teenagers. ;)
(In other news, five hours of being in the weak sun and I'm sun burnt. I think I need a parasol.)
I do wish they'd clear up some of the issues regarding art, but I can only hope they're on the right track. And admitting that yes, non-photographic images of minors engaged in sex isn't illegal, they just don't want it here. Which, hey, I may not exactly be happy with that, but it's their decision and they're being pretty up front about it.
I'm just glad they finally realized that yes, smutty fan fiction with teenagers isn't child porn.
I think this calls for another round of Porn for the Revolution!
So give me a pairing and a prompt, and I'll write you between 100 and 500 words of pure smut! Bonus points if the characters are teenagers. ;)
(In other news, five hours of being in the weak sun and I'm sun burnt. I think I need a parasol.)
no subject
There's a little personal discussion from the same staffer later on where it gets into debates over what's 'glorifying' child porn in fiction, but none of that's official. And there's later on discussion about adding in that child pornography does not include written depictions of sexual acts involving minors into the final draft of the policy.
Since Sixapart is out of the picture, I'm honestly a lot more inclined to believe LJ. So far, I've had no issues with our new owners and how they handle things. And they really are taking user suggestions to heart and trying to implement them.
no subject