Right here: http://community.livejournal.com/lj_policy/1696.html?thread=426400#t426400
There's a little personal discussion from the same staffer later on where it gets into debates over what's 'glorifying' child porn in fiction, but none of that's official. And there's later on discussion about adding in that child pornography does not include written depictions of sexual acts involving minors into the final draft of the policy.
Since Sixapart is out of the picture, I'm honestly a lot more inclined to believe LJ. So far, I've had no issues with our new owners and how they handle things. And they really are taking user suggestions to heart and trying to implement them.
no subject
There's a little personal discussion from the same staffer later on where it gets into debates over what's 'glorifying' child porn in fiction, but none of that's official. And there's later on discussion about adding in that child pornography does not include written depictions of sexual acts involving minors into the final draft of the policy.
Since Sixapart is out of the picture, I'm honestly a lot more inclined to believe LJ. So far, I've had no issues with our new owners and how they handle things. And they really are taking user suggestions to heart and trying to implement them.