said_scarlett: (Naomi Demon)
Faye ([personal profile] said_scarlett) wrote2008-02-03 10:38 pm
Entry tags:

On Horror.....

As most everyone knows at this point, I write horror. In a semi-professional capacity, as I have had a handful of horror-themed stories published in small print magazines. Nothing big, but I read a lot of horror, I watch a lot of horror, and I play a lot of horror. And I research it.

I subscribe to a few newsletters and the like, mostly filled with reviews and articles and a few essays. And a recent essay I read got me to thinking. And as it's eleven o'clock at night and it's horrifically stormy out, my mind has begun to wander and has spit up this post.

The essay was on the evolution of entertainment horror. Interesting enough read, but one thing stuck out to me.

"...what Lovecraft and Poe and the other fathers of horror did was scary at the time, but not in modern day..."

This gave me pause. I thought back to all the older horror stories I've read, and wondered why the themes and monsters and situations wouldn't be frightening today.

Now, admittedly, maybe the way in which they were written wouldn't be quite as frightening today as it was when first written, but that doesn't mean that what they wrote isn't still scary. Most of the staples that those forefathers of horror laid down are alive and well today, and still used to scare the bejeezus out of people. Everything from the supernatural - ghosts and monsters and the like - to the situational - being buried alive, being trapped in a horrific alternate reality - all are still used in modern day horror.

And when attempts to try something nice and new crop up - Sam Raimi, I'm looking at you* - often they just don't really work.

I am of the mind, however, that it isn't necessarily the thing that is scary. It's the way in which it's presented. Atmosphere is integral to horror. Which is why I have an issue with a lot of modern horror movies - it's all gore and slashing and very little mood. Very little subtlety. It kind of reminds me of a strip Penny Arcade did, where it boiled down to Survival Horror = Monster Jumps Through A Window. And going back to what I mentioned in my above paragraph, recent attempts at creeping, subtle terror have fallen somewhat flat.

I find it in a great deal of horror novels and stories, too. Even my greatest influence and admiration, Stephen King himself, is guilty of this. Hell, I'm guilty of it, as anyone in [livejournal.com profile] damned can tell you. But is this because of the evolution of the genre, or the evolution of the audience?

Are we all so jaded and used to being bombarded by visual images that it's the only thing that gets through to us? Are we so used to the horrible and horrific in modern day life, that only gruesome death and dismemberment frighten us? Or has everything else really been played out, so ingrained into us that it's more stale than scary? There are dozens of theories, invoking everything from science to evolution to desensitization. And still, I wonder.

So what scares you? What's the scariest thing you've ever read, seen, played, heard? Share, and maybe shed a little light on my wonderings.

______________________________________________

*I'm referring to the movie 'The Messengers', which ended up some bizarre crossover between Silent Hill and John Steinbeck.
regann: (Default)

[personal profile] regann 2008-02-04 06:50 am (UTC)(link)
Media that has truly scared me in the past fifteen years: the old version of The Haunting; the computer game Shivers (locked in an abandoned museum of weird/paranormal things, hunting rogue evil South American Spirits) and the film Stir of Echoes which haunted me.

I hate hate hate gory psycho-slash movies in the vein of Hostel or Tourista (?) or the Saw movies. They make me sick, not only because what's on screen but that people thought it up and that others can stand to watch it. EW EW EW.

I don't know if you care but similar questions have been posed about porn -- people are going more and more extreme, doing nastier and more shocking things until they've reached a point where plain old sex just doesn't do it for people anymore and they have to keep going farther and farther. I've only seen some of the tamest 'extreme' stuff out there and it's sooo disgusting I can't even think about it. (Please remember that I am not a perv but I used to work in the porn industry. :) )

Personally, I agree about atmosphere and almost suspense, as well as the fact that what you can't see is alot of time scarier than what you can. You never see anything in the original Haunting and that movie freaked me out so bad, I didn't want my mom to leave me alone. XD

[identity profile] theladyfeylene.livejournal.com 2008-02-04 07:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Ooooh, I've never heard of Shivers. But I looked it up real quick and I think I'm going to try and get my hands on it!

I've actually noticed that, at least in some capacity. I really like classic hentai, back when there were actual plots and stories and interesting characters, and I always check out the new stuff just in case. And....yes. I've noticed that trend. And hentai was pretty extreme even in the 80s. (hahaha, it's okay, I remember! :D)

Yes! Lovecraft was a master of the 'not describing the monster' and still evoking massive terror.

[identity profile] theangstmonkey.livejournal.com 2008-02-05 01:14 am (UTC)(link)
The old Haunting totally freaked me out too!

I have to say though... the original Saw movie wasn't that bad, as far as gore. It was more about the situation of the two men trapped in the room together than it was about the gore. Even the gory traps were done as flashbacks with filters and sped up film so that you didn't really see as much as the later films. I really enjoyed the first one, it was all the ones after that that lost me. :(